c# - Compare without generics -


There is a little problem to solve me.

I have a list of items, though later the list. Two of the examples will be filled in different types

The first type is MyFirstType & LT; T1, T2 & gt; and the other is MySecondType & LT; T & gt;

Now I need to run the list of objects and ask which of these items is there then I need to make some custom arguments on the item

example for:. 

  foreach (object obj in the list) {if (obj MyFirstType & lt; T1, T2 & gt;) {// do something} and if (obj is MySecondType & lt; ... {}} {}}   
 The problem can be T or T1 and T2 in any way, so how can I write such a thing - what is a keyword statement that only types the waiver of the forgiveness , But the generic is not inside?  If (obj MyFirstType & lt; T1, T2 & gt;)  does not work, because it needs solid type for T1 and T2  
 Just refer to T1 And need to compare without T2 .. How to solve any idea   
 
 
 You can use the property of  IsGenericType  If you can type  type , then check  obj.GetType ()  is normal and  GetGenericTypeDefinition  is the general type definition, which is To be used to get the typeof (MyFirstType & LT ;, & gt;)  and  typeof (MySecondType :  
  foreach (list obj) {if (obj .GetType () IsGenericType} {if (obj.GetType () GetGenericTypeDefinition () == typeof .. (MyFirstType & lt;; & gt;)) {// do something} else if (obj.GetGenericTypeDefinition () == typeof (MySecondType & lt; & gt;)) {}}}

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

c# - ASP.NET MVC - Attaching an entity of type 'MODELNAME' failed because another entity of the same type already has the same primary key value -

In brief, the wrapper module is inserted during posting and the status of an entry is changed to 'modified' . Before changing the state, the state is set to 'separate', but calling attachments () causes the same error to be thrown away. I am using EF 6. Model / wrapper class public class avi model {public A is a {get; Set; } Public listing & lt; B & gt; B {received; Set; } Public cc {receipt; Set; }} Administrator edit public functioning (int? id) {if (id == null) {new HttpStatusCodeResult (HttpStatusCode.BadRequest); } If (! Conveyor Access (id.Value)) new HTTPTitus code result (HTTP status code. Forbidden); Var aViewModel = new AViewModel (); aViewModel.A = db.As.Find (id); If (aViewModel.Receipt == zero) {return HttpNotFound (); } aViewModel.b = db.Bs.Where (x => x.aid == id.Value) .Oolist (); AViewModel.Vendor = db.Cs.Where (x => x.cid == aViewModel.a.cID) .FirstOrDefault (); See Return (aViewModel); } [HTPFost] [Valid AntitiferousTeacon...
Read more

jasper reports - How to center align barcode using jasperreports and barcode4j -

I use iReport 5.5.0 . How to align a barcode component to the center The relevant piece of my jrxml is below & Lt; JR: Code 128 xmlns: JR = "http://jasperreports.sourceforge.net/jasperreports/components" xsi: schemaLocation = "http://jasperreports.sourceforge.net/jasperreports/components http: //jasperreports.sourceforge Purge / xsd / components.xsd "textPosition =" bottom "& gt; & Lt; Jr: codeExpression & gt; & Lt; [CDATA [$ F {number}]] & gt; & Lt; / Jr: codeExpression & gt; & Lt; / Jr: Code 128 & gt; & Lt; / componentElement & gt; "Text" itemprop = "text"> Create a style after this, it is called "barcode", like: & lt; Style name = "barcode" fontName = "Helvetica" fONTSIZE = "10" hAlign = "center" valign = "center" /> and set the property of your barcode element to "barcode".
Read more

django - CommandError: You must set settings.ALLOWED_HOSTS if DEBUG is False -

I use Django 1.6.5 with settings in my program txsite: DEBUG = true I set the lie to debug, but when I get the runner , I get the following error: CommandError: You have to set the settings. OLOWOWHESTS If DEBUG is False I ALLOWED_HOSTS = ['127.0.0.1', 'localhost'] but I get the same error. Does anyone know this address? Try ALLOWED_HOSTS = ['*'] Less secure If you are not on a firewall or public LAN, but what I use and it works. Edit: Interestingly enough, I have to add some of my 1.8 projects, even if DEBUG = True . Why so very uncertain
Read more